ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Digital Literacy and Self-Rated Health in China: Dual Pathways Through Information Accessibility and Mental Health.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From access to capability: digital literacy and health inequality in contemporary China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital literacy is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of health, yet the mechanisms linking it to self-rated health in transitional economies like China remain underexplored. This study examines how digital literacy influences self-rated health, directly and indirectly through mental health, while exploring heterogeneity across age and gender groups. Methods: Using data from the 2023 Chinese General Social Survey (n=8,039 adults aged 18 and above), we constructed a multidimensional digital literacy index via entropy weighting and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), integrating dimensions of digital access, usage, and entertainment. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and multi-group analyses were employed to test relationships, controlling for gender, age, and education. Model fit was assessed using RMSEA, CFI, and other indices; robustness was verified through alternative specifications, sensitivity checks, and outlier trimming. Results: Digital literacy had a significant positive effect on self-rated health (β=0.115, p<0.001), comprising a direct effect (β=0.076, p<0.001) and an indirect effect via mental health (β=0.039, p<0.001; mediation proportion=33.9%). Multi-group SEM revealed heterogeneity: effects were strongest in young and middle-aged females (β=0.141-0.143, p<0.001) and weaker in older adults (eg, β=0.050 for females >60, p<0.01). Mental health mediated more strongly in older groups (β=0.500, p<0.001). The model explained 38.5% of variance in self-rated health. Conclusion: Digital literacy positively influences self-rated health by enhancing resource access and mental well-being, with pronounced benefits for younger and female populations. Policymakers should prioritize age-appropriate digital literacy initiatives with psychological support to reduce disparities, aligning with China's "Healthy China 2030" and "Digital China" strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.