ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Which interventions optimize antibiotic prescribing in primary care in England? A survey and Qualitative Comparative Analysis of NHS Integrated Care Boards.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimizing antibiotic use is a UK Government priority. This study aimed to identify which combinations of interventions are associated with meeting primary care antibiotic prescribing targets in England's National Health Service, going beyond typical evaluations of individual interventions. Methods: Data on interventions implemented by Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in England were collected via an online survey (October 2023 to January 2024). The survey gathered information about 61 interventions covering data monitoring, incentives, governance, staff training, guidance, diagnostics, decision support tools and public awareness-raising activities.The survey data were linked to ICB-level antibiotic prescribing data, analysed descriptively and through a set-theoretic approach (fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, fsQCA). Clusters of ICBs that used a common set of interventions and met prescribing targets were identified. The average prescribing rates were calculated for each cluster and compared with ICBs that did not implement those interventions. Results: Fifty-four responses were received from staff at 29 out of 42 ICBs (69%). Locally adapted prescribing guidance was used by all ICBs meeting targets. ICBs that monitored data and used incentives, guidance and/or challenged prescribers on their behaviour had the lowest prescribing. Implementing diagnostics, staff training or public awareness-raising interventions was not associated with lower prescribing. Conclusions: In a country that has been reducing antibiotic prescribing and implementing numerous antimicrobial stewardship interventions over the last decade, commissioning organizations that met policy targets were using combinations of a limited number of interventions by 2024. National and local efforts could therefore start prioritizing fewer interventions to further reduce prescribing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.