ArticleCureus2025
Role of USG and CT in the Evaluation of Abdominal Trauma.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Delayed splenic rupture following video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and imaging patterns of abdominal injuries using USG and CT in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Specifically, it assessed the ability of USG and CT to detect hemoperitoneum, intraperitoneal visceral injuries, and solid organ injuries. Imaging findings from USG and CT were analyzed and compared with intraoperative findings to facilitate early and accurate diagnosis, thereby aiding clinicians in timely management and minimizing morbidity and mortality. Methodology Patients admitted to Shri B. M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre with a history of abdominal trauma between November 2019 and May 2021 were included. A total of 64 patients who underwent both USG and CT examinations were evaluated. In cases requiring surgical intervention, imaging findings were compared with intraoperative observations. Results Among the 64 patients, all (100%) had positive USG and CT findings of abdominal trauma. Of these, 19 (29.7%) patients underwent surgery, while 45 (70.3%) were managed conservatively. There was a marked male predominance, with 60 (93.7%) males and four (6.3%) females, yielding a male-to-female ratio of 15:1. The most commonly injured organs were the spleen in 35 (54.7%) patients and the liver in 28 (43.7%) patients. Conclusions USG is a dynamic, real-time imaging modality that avoids ionizing radiation and is inexpensive, rapid, portable, and suitable for bedside use in hemodynamically unstable patients or those with multiple injuries. Minimal patient preparation is required, and the procedure is painless. Emergency USG can therefore be employed as a first-line diagnostic tool in suspected blunt abdominal trauma. CT, however, remains a highly sensitive modality for diagnosing and classifying abdominal injuries and provides valuable guidance for clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.