ArticleCureus2025
Laparoscopic Removal of Multiple Ingested Magnets Using the Appendix and Meckel's Diverticulum: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a marked increase over the last two decades in pediatric cases involving ingestion of multiple magnets, which can cause serious, potentially life-threatening gastrointestinal complications. More than half of such incidents require surgery, and nearly three-quarters are managed via laparotomy. Magnet extraction through laparoscopic appendectomy has been described as a viable, minimally invasive method in selected cases. We report the case of a seven-year-old boy with a staggered ingestion of two magnetic spheres. The initial abdominal radiograph showed the magnets in separate locations. An urgent endoscopic retrieval attempt was unsuccessful, and subsequent radiographs demonstrated that the magnets adhered to each other in a fixed position. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed the magnets causing an adhesion between the caecal wall and the ileum with signs of imminent perforation. The magnet located in the cecum was removed via appendectomy. Inspection of the small bowel loops revealed a Meckel's diverticulum. The second magnet was guided into the diverticulum, secured with an endoclip, and the diverticulum containing the magnet was then exteriorized through the umbilicus and resected. This report highlights the effectiveness of appendectomy in the removal of ingested magnets. It also underscores the importance of thoroughly inspecting the small bowel during laparoscopy, as unexpected anatomical findings (such as a Meckel's diverticulum) may influence the surgical strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.