ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention Compared to Antibiotic Therapy in Managing Localized Diverticular Perforation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal management of localized diverticular perforation remains uncertain, with ongoing debate between surgical intervention and conservative antibiotic therapy. While randomized trials have addressed uncomplicated diverticulitis, evidence specific to perforated disease is limited and heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical intervention compared to antibiotic therapy in managing localized diverticular perforation in adults, focusing on key clinical outcomes including adverse events, stoma creation, mortality, and intra-abdominal abscess formation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing surgical versus antibiotic therapy in adults with localized diverticular perforation. Major outcomes included composite adverse events, stoma creation, all-cause mortality, and intra-abdominal abscess. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Four comparative studies (n = 12,922 patients) were included. For composite adverse outcomes, no significant pooled difference was observed (Pooled OR 3.79, 95% CI 0.36-39.56, p = 0.266; I² = 97.4%), though individual studies showed conflicting results. Surgical intervention was associated with a significantly higher risk of stoma creation compared to antibiotics (Pooled OR 16.16, 95% CI 4.11-63.63, p < 0.001; I² = 43.3%). Mortality did not differ significantly between groups (Pooled OR 3.68, 95% CI 0.28-47.99, p = 0.320; I² = 88.8%). Intra-abdominal abscess rates were also comparable (Pooled OR 3.01, 95% CI 0.53-17.07, p = 0.212; I² = 87.8%). Surgical management of localized diverticular perforation provides definitive treatment but significantly increases the risk of stoma creation. Antibiotic therapy may be effective in carefully selected patients, particularly when initiated promptly, although study findings remain inconsistent. Given the high heterogeneity across available studies, further randomized trials are needed to establish evidence-based guidance for treatment selection in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.