ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
[Clinical coordination and strengthening of primary care for cancer diagnosis in Latin America: a scoping reviewCoordenação clínica e fortalecimento da atenção primária no diagnóstico do câncer na América Latina: revisão de escopo].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the knowledge available in Latin America about clinical coordination (CC) between levels of care, the knowledge of primary care (PC) providers about cancer diagnosis, associated factors, and interventions for the improvement thereof. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts, data on study characteristics and main results were extracted and synthesized in accordance with the conceptual framework of CC. Results: Of 4,937 records identified, 20 were included, mostly from Brazil and Mexico, covering breast, cervical, and oral cancer. Very few studies analyzed CC in cancer diagnosis; those that did reported issues in both management coordination and clinical information. Additionally, limited knowledge of signs and symptoms that should prompt diagnostic suspicion and limited adherence to clinical practice guidelines were identified among PC providers. No interventions to improve CC were identified. Studies of those aimed at improving diagnostic suspicion did not assess intermediate outcomes, although a reduction in time to diagnosis was demonstrated. Conclusions: There is a significant knowledge gap in Latin America regarding CC in cancer diagnosis, and few interventions to improve diagnostic capacity in the PC setting. Strengthening PC and improving CC is essential to reducing diagnostic delays that contribute to cancer mortality in fragmented health systems, such as those of Latin America, which entails significant challenges for research in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.