ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Evolution of vestibular schwannoma management in the 21
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Successful radiosurgery for a growing vestibular schwannoma following partial resection of an ipsilateral transfundal inner ear schwannoma and cochlear implantation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient participation affected management decision-making trends over the past two decades. This study aimed to survey trends in vestibular schwannoma (VS) management using a large national database. Methods: This analysis collated demographic and clinical data for 23,488 VS cases from 2004 to 2021 using the national surveillance, epidemiology, and end result database. Relationships between tumor size and age were analyzed with Chi-square and logistic regression and trends over time were assessed. Results: Across the study period, a statistically significant portion of older patients was managed with observation compared to younger patients. The relationship of age to initial management persisted across tumor sizes. From 2004 to 2021, observation was increasingly popular. The strongest relationship between time and treatment modality was observed in young patients (<65), for which there was a 16.6% point increase in observation and a 10.9% point decrease in surgery between the extremes of the study period. This trend is contrasted with the trend in radiation therapy over this time in the elderly population, in whom the rate of radiation nearly halved (39.9-22.7%) from 2004 to 2018. Conclusion: This large database study demonstrates the impact that the dawn of the century had on trends in the management of VS. Over the past 20 years, treatment options have not changed greatly, but the way the options are utilized evolved with time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.