ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
A smartphone-based augmented reality technique for preoperative planning of chronic subdural hematoma.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma is one of the most common pathologies in neurosurgery and represents one of the first surgical challenges for residents and surgeons in their early years of experience, particularly when the hematoma lacks a typical hemispheric distribution. Our study presents an innovative and low-cost smartphone-based augmented reality (AR) technique designed to facilitate the preoperative planning of chronic subdural hematomas. Methods: Twenty patients with non-fully hemispheric subdural hematomas operated using a smartphone-based AR platform (AR-based planning, AR-b) were included in our study. Before the skin incision, the site and extent of the surgical access were verified by a second surgeon, whose planning was based solely on 2D computed tomography images (2D-b). Data regarding spatial discrepancies and length differences between the two planning were collected and analyzed with a paired Results: No discrepancies >1 cm were found between the two methods. We found a significant difference between the length of the two planning phases (AR-b: 8' ± 1,9 vs. 2D-b: 4,1' ± 1,4). Nevertheless, concerning the overall surgical duration, no marked difference was found between the total length of the procedures performed with AR-b and similar procedures planned with 2D-b. Conclusion: Due to its lack of additional costs and effective precision, our technique represents a valuable aid for surgeons in training or in their early years of experience in the presurgical planning of chronic subdural hematoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.