Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409739›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Crack detection in structural images using a hybrid Swin Transformer and enhanced features representation block.

N Anusha, L Jani Anbarasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N AnushaDepartment of IoT, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
L Jani AnbarasiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This paper presents a crack detection framework employing a hybrid model that integrates the Swin Transformer with an Enhanced Features Representation Block (EFRB) to precisely detect cracks in images. Methods: The Swin Transformer captures long-range dependencies and efficiently processes complex images, forming the backbone of the feature extraction process. The EFRB improved spatial granularity through depthwise convolutions, that focus on spatial features independently across each channel, and pointwise convolutions to improve channel representation. The proposed model used residual connections to enable deeper networks to overcome vanishing gradient problem. Results and discussion: The training process is optimized using population-based feature selection, resulting in robust performance. The network is trained on a dataset split into 80% training and 20% testing, with a learning rate of 1e-3, batch size of 16, and 30 epochs. Evaluation results show that the model achieves an accuracy of 98%, with precision, recall, and F1-scores as 0.97, 0.99, and 0.98 for crack detection, respectively. These results show the effectiveness of the proposed architecture for real-world crack detection applications in structural monitoring.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkcrack detectionpopulation-based optimizationresidual networkswin transformer

Identifiers

PMID41409739
PMCPMC12706109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.