ArticleEJHaem2025
Development of Machine-Assisted, Human-Centred Bone Marrow Cell Classification: Feasibility Analysis in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cytomorphological examination and classification of bone marrow (BM) cells using a microscope is essential for diagnosing various diseases affecting the haematopoietic system. However, this requires expertise, is effort-intensive and is inherently subjective. Methods: We developed a method for automatically capturing BM cell images at the single-cell level using an existing cell image analyser designed for peripheral blood. The captured BM cell images were pre-classified by the same analyser and subsequently viewed on a large screen by cytomorphologists for BM cell classification. The data consistency in BM blast percentages between the digital and conventional optical microscopy (CM) methods was examined. Results: During the 3.5-year study period, 657 (96.2%) of the 683 aspirated samples underwent BM cell classification using the digital method. Digital cell images were captured at 2000× magnification and stored permanently, which allowed high-quality cell image analysis at any time by anyone. Cell images could be compared side-by-side across different cell classes, which improves the cell-classification accuracy. The detailed cell morphology in some cases differed slightly between the digital images and CM. BM blast percentage was comparable between the developed method and CM when examining patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and other conditions that need to be differentiated from MDS. In a multicentre study, cytomorphologists who used this method for the first time could perform cell classification. Conclusion: This machine-assisted and human-centred approach enhances objectivity in BM cell classification, aligns with the needs of the digital era and facilitates data sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.