ArticleNational science review2025
Potential of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves to advance the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling the effects of climate risk on primates globally: New perspectives on conservation priorities.Science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As one of UNESCO's three key site-based designations, the World Network of Biosphere Reserves (BRs) integrates conservation and development, setting it apart from traditional protected areas (PAs). Yet its conservation effectiveness and role in advancing the global biodiversity agenda remain underexplored. This evidence-based global assessment of BRs' effectiveness and potential in supporting the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) indicates that generally BRs maintained habitat quality not lower than that of PAs, with region-specific instances where BRs surpassed sites in IUCN Categories IV-VI. Including BRs-typically omitted from global conservation statistics-into conservation efforts increased terrestrial coverage for KMGBF Target 3 from 16.57% to 19.65%. With effective implementation, integration of BRs into the global area-based conservation network would produce measurable coverage gains across six KMGBF-linked opportunity templates, including +8.47% for Biodiversity Hotspots (per Target 1), +4.05% for Risk Ecoregions (per Target 2), +7.01% for Phylogenetic Diversity Hotspots (per Target 4), +7.25% for areas of high Traded Functional Diversity (per Target 5), +4.37% for regions of High Biomass Carbon (per Target 8), and +1.95% for globally Indigenous Lands (per Target 22). Based on integrated assessments of conservation value and coverage rate, 17 Udvardy's Biogeographical Provinces were identified as post-2025 WNBR expansion priorities that align with the KMGBF and the Hangzhou Strategic Action Plan (2026-2035).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.