Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409701›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

A systematic review of global COVID-19 vaccine PPPs: drivers and barriers to governance alignment.

Xuejing Qi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuejing QiDepartment of Public Governance and Management, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have emerged as a prominent governance model for vaccine equity in the COVID-19 vaccine supply chain. Previous studies focus on evaluating PPP's performance, lacking multi-dimensional analysis on the drivers and barriers that shape public and private actors' willingness to participate in PPPs. Method: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review using the Web of Science (WoS) database was conducted to identify empirical factors influencing stakeholders' preference for PPPs and the alignment between sectors was explored by qualitative content analysis. Results: Three main categories of private sector drivers were identified, including regulatory facilitation, financial incentives and reputational incentives. While four sets of barriers emerged, including the political environment, economic and logistic constraints, and the contractual obligations. For the public sector, motivations centered on ethical considerations, national interest protection, and institutional advantages, while participation was also constrained by vaccine nationalism and administrative lag. The analysis demonstrates the degree of alignment and misalignment among these governance factors. Conclusion: Based on the analysis of factors, this study proposes the Governance Alignment Framework (GAF) as a conceptual tool to pair the profits of different sectors and guide governments and public sectors to improve the developmental-steering capacities to better align private incentives with public value during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsGlobal HealthHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineglobal health governancepolicy coordinationpublic-private partnershipsvaccine supply chain

Identifiers

PMID41409701
PMCPMC12706164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.