ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Determinants of life expectancy in high longevity countries: evidence from machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Environmental Degradation, ICT, Health Expenditure, and Institutional Quality Affect Life Expectancy?American journal of men's healthArticle
- A Comparative Analysis of the Determinants of Male, Female, and Total Life Expectancy in United States and China.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health is directly aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Good Health and Well-Being, which emphasizes ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages. The present study investigates the determinants of life expectancy (LEX) by incorporating a comprehensive set of factors: CO₂ emissions as an environmental factor; GDP, health expenditure, and research and development (R&D) as economic factors; education and individual internet use as social factors; and rule of law and government effectiveness as institutional factors. Using panel data for the top 20 high-life-expectancy countries covering the period 2001-2023, this study applies both traditional econometric techniques namely, PMG, fixed effects, and FMOLS estimators and advanced machine learning approaches, specifically Gradient Boosting and Random Forest. The regression results reveal that CO₂ emissions negatively affect LEX, whereas GDP, health expenditure, education, internet use, rule of law, government effectiveness, and R&D exert positive influences. The machine learning results further indicate that GDP, health expenditure, and education are the three most critical predictors of LEX in both Gradient Boosting and Random Forest models, with GDP emerging as the most dominant factor. Institutional variables such as rule of law, government effectiveness, and R&D display moderate importance, while CO₂ emissions and individual internet use consistently rank as the least influential. In terms of predictive performance, Gradient Boosting outperforms Random Forest across evaluation metrics, demonstrating lower errors and higher explanatory power. In light of these findings, this study also provides important policy implications to enhance LEX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.