Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Features of interactive recipes that support college students' self-efficacy in preparing produce.

Kim Spaccarotella, Sofiia Korotka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kim SpaccarotellaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kean University, Union, NJ, United States.
Sofiia KorotkaDepartment of Integrative Sciences and Technology, Kean University, Union, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: College students often struggle with produce intake due to factors including limited kitchen access, lack of culinary skills, nutrition knowledge, time, and money. Previous research identified recipe videos as useful for improving college students' self-efficacy in the kitchen and in preparing healthy but less-familiar food items including fresh produce provided by a campus food pantry or garden. The purpose of the current project was to develop and test an interactive, student-friendly recipe book and gather feedback about additional resources that may help students increase self-efficacy in preparing produce. Methods: The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning was used to create brief cooking videos for a recipe book featuring common ingredients from a campus garden and food pantry. A short survey assessed nutrition self-efficacy and gathered feedback about the book and resources students felt would be most helpful. Results: Average daily vegetable intake was 2.05 ± 1.53 servings per day ( Discussion: Interactive recipe books may help college students use produce, and feedback from this study can help inform development of education materials for public health nutrition interventions for this population. Research should explore long-term impact of the recipe book across a larger population and with other interactive tools that may support produce consumption.

Indexed as

CookingDiet, HealthyStudentsCookbooks as TopicFruitHealth PromotionHumansSelf EfficacyUniversitiesVegetablesYoung Adultcollege studentsnutritionproducerecipe bookself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID41409691
PMCPMC12707162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.