ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Features of interactive recipes that support college students' self-efficacy in preparing produce.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: College students often struggle with produce intake due to factors including limited kitchen access, lack of culinary skills, nutrition knowledge, time, and money. Previous research identified recipe videos as useful for improving college students' self-efficacy in the kitchen and in preparing healthy but less-familiar food items including fresh produce provided by a campus food pantry or garden. The purpose of the current project was to develop and test an interactive, student-friendly recipe book and gather feedback about additional resources that may help students increase self-efficacy in preparing produce. Methods: The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning was used to create brief cooking videos for a recipe book featuring common ingredients from a campus garden and food pantry. A short survey assessed nutrition self-efficacy and gathered feedback about the book and resources students felt would be most helpful. Results: Average daily vegetable intake was 2.05 ± 1.53 servings per day ( Discussion: Interactive recipe books may help college students use produce, and feedback from this study can help inform development of education materials for public health nutrition interventions for this population. Research should explore long-term impact of the recipe book across a larger population and with other interactive tools that may support produce consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.