ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Fully Automated Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Evans Index Measurement from Raw 3D MRI.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventriculomegaly is a key neuroimaging feature in conditions such as normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and other disorders of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. The Evans Index (EI), defined as the ratio of the maximal frontal horn width to the maximal inner skull diameter, remains a simple and widely used marker for ventricular enlargement. However, manual EI measurement is subject to observer variability and dependent on proper alignment to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC) plane, limiting reproducibility in large-scale and multi-center studies. We present a fully automated deep learning-based pipeline for EI calculation directly from raw T1-weighted MPRAGE MRI scans. The pipeline integrates (i) landmark detection using the BrainSignsNet model, (ii) rigid AC-PC alignment, and (iii) robust segmentation of the lateral ventricles (LV) and intracranial volume (ICV) via nnU-Net models, including a custom ventricular network trained on 1,300 annotated scans enriched for hydrocephalus. The Evans Index is then derived from automated measurement of frontal horn width and inner skull diameter at the aligned axial slice. Internal validation using data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, BIOCARD, and Johns Hopkins cohorts demonstrated high segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient = 0.98). External validation on the PENS trial, including pre- and post-shunt NPH scans, showed excellent agreement with expert manual EI measurements (mean bias = 0.0068, mean absolute error = 0.0103, r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Bias analyses revealed no significant association between measurement error and age, sex, or ventricular volume This fully automated, orientation-standardized method achieves accurate and reproducible Evans Index measurement across diverse MRI datasets. By eliminating manual intervention, the pipeline enhances scalability for large neuroimaging cohorts and provides a reliable tool for clinical assessment, screening and monitoring of ventriculomegaly, especially in NPH.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.