ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
FREQUENCY OF AORTIC MISCANNULATION DURING FLUOROSCOPY-FREE ENDOVASCULAR NAVIGATION.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Aortic wire cannulation is sometimes performed without the assistance of fluoroscopy for expediency, but the associated risk of miscannulation has not been quantified. We used human cadavers and an electronic endovascular simulator to characterize guidewire misplacement rates during attempted fluoroscopy-free cannulation of the descending thoracic aorta. Methods: Aortic cannulation was done in perfused human cadavers (n=10, age 81±13 years) and in their vascular anatomies loaded into the Mentice VISTG5 simulator to validate the method. Trauma Computerized Tomography Angiography scans (n=89, age 47±24 years, range 5-93 years) were used to build 3D vascular models and assess morphometric variability in vessel tortuosity, length, and branch angulations. Aortic miscannulation frequency was measured using an electronic simulator with multiple passes using a wire-feeding mechanism, and the results were analyzed in the context of age. Results: Aortic miscannulation was the same in cadavers as in the electronic simulator (12%) for all passes. Electronic simulation using a larger cohort demonstrated that miscannulations occurred in 36% of all subjects, and the frequency for all passes was 10±18%. Aortic miscannulation frequency was lower in <50-year-old subjects (5±11%) than in >50-year-old subjects (16±22%), and the most frequent misplacement locations were into the iliac (5%), celiac (2%), and the superior mesenteric arteries (1%). Conclusions: Fluoroscopy-free aortic cannulation may be associated with significant miscannulation rates, particularly in subjects older than 50 years. Fluoroscopic confirmation of wire location or endovascular devices capable of detecting and avoiding aortic miscannulation may reduce aortic access complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.