Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409643›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2025

Telemedicine for COVID-19 management in Brazil: outcomes and health system implications from a prospective cohort study.

Ana Silvia Sartori Barraviera Seabra Ferreira, Cassiana Mendes Bertoncelo Fontes, Lehana Thabane, Carolina Russo Simon, João Pedro Pereira Caetano de Lima, Jean Carlos Possidônio da Silva, Benedito Barraviera, Raul Borges Guimarães, Pasqual Barretti, Rui Seabra Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Silvia Sartori Barraviera Seabra FerreiraCenter for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (Cevap), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2035-7731
Cassiana Mendes Bertoncelo FontesBotucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-8637
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-9734
Carolina Russo SimonDepartment of Geography, School of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5875-580X
João Pedro Pereira Caetano de LimaDepartment of Geography, School of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-910X
Jean Carlos Possidônio da SilvaBotucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0079-028X
Benedito BarravieraCenter for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (Cevap), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-5594
Raul Borges GuimarãesGraduate Program in Geography, Faculty of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9925-5374
Pasqual BarrettiBotucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4979-4836
Rui Seabra FerreiraCenter for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (Cevap), São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-0512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in traditional disease surveillance systems, particularly in data reporting and contact tracing. Telemedicine emerged as a promising approach to expand remote access to healthcare. This study aimed to evaluate a newly implemented telemedicine system designed to manage patients with COVID-19, reduce hospital overload, enable early case detection and isolation, ensure rapid response to clinical deterioration, simplify medical records, and provide ongoing patient support. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted using the E-care telemedicine system to assist adult patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms at a Brazilian university between June 2021 and June 2024. Results: The E-care system delivered care to 6,129 patients, predominantly female, white university students. Physicians attended over 80% (4,903/6,129) of patients and prescribed medications to nearly 28% (1,411/5,041). Medical certificates for time off work were issued to 43% (2,635/6,129) of participants. COVID-19 tests were recommended for approximately 24% of patients, with a positivity rate above 81% among those who returned results. Only 66 patients (1.2%) required in-person care, and no COVID-19-related deaths were reported. Patient satisfaction was high, with 96% (5,584/6,129) expressing satisfaction or high satisfaction with the service. Conclusions: This study provides robust evidence supporting the successful implementation of a telemedicine system for managing COVID-19 cases. The large number of users highlights an unmet demand for virtual healthcare. Telemedicine was rapidly adopted, achieved high patient satisfaction, and contributed to reducing hospital burden, promoting early detection, and minimizing in-person consultations. These findings reinforce the value of telemedicine as an essential tool for health systems and policymakers to strengthen care delivery beyond the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public healthRemote consultationTeleconsultationTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41409643
PMCPMC12707318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.