ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025
The role of interventional pulmonology in management of pulmonary nodules during lung cancer screening.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Related Risks in Interventional Pulmonology: An Exploratory Enumeration and Ranking Study Across Five General-Purpose Large Language Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bronchial Wall T2-Weighted MRI Signal: An Emerging Investigational Non-Ionizing Imaging Biomarker in Severe Asthma.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Thoracic ultrasound elastography in pleural and subpleural diseases: a narrative review.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Induced Deskilling in Interventional Pulmonology: An International Cross-Sectional Survey on Risk Perception and Mitigation Strategies.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Observational
- The price of immune awakening: bridging knowledge gaps in checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pleural effusion and pneumothorax detection on thoracic ultrasound: an educational viewpoint on the promise, pitfalls and path forward.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Analysis for Pleural Effusion Detection on Thoracic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography has significantly increased the detection of pulmonary nodules, most of which are peripherally located and difficult to access. Effectively addressing these findings remains a clinical challenge, particularly in balancing diagnostic accuracy with procedural risk. Advances in interventional pulmonology have enabled minimally invasive approaches that may support both diagnosis and treatment, especially in selected patients with peripherally located nodules or limited surgical options. However, evidence on their effectiveness, accessibility and integration into screening workflows remains variable. In this review, we discuss the current role of interventional pulmonology in the context of lung cancer screening, outlining its potential benefits, limitations, and areas requiring further research to define its place within multidisciplinary care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.