ArticleBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025
Exploring pleural effusion characterisation with quantitative thoracic ultrasound imaging: a viewpoint on the investigational role of pixel-based echogenicity analysis in transudate and exudate differentiation.
Article in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracic ultrasound elastography in pleural and subpleural diseases: a narrative review.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for pleural effusion and pneumothorax detection on thoracic ultrasound: an educational viewpoint on the promise, pitfalls and path forward.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Analysis for Pleural Effusion Detection on Thoracic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pulmonary infections.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleural effusion represents a frequent and diagnostically challenging condition across multiple clinical settings. Conventional characterisation relies on invasive thoracentesis and biochemical analysis, with Light's criteria offering high sensitivity but limited specificity. Procedural risks and patient factors may limit fluid sampling, highlighting the need for complementary, noninvasive approaches. Recent advances in thoracic ultrasound (TUS) suggest that quantitative assessment of pleural fluid (PF) echogenicity, particularly pixel density analysis and hypoechogenicity index, may represent an investigational approach for objective and reproducible evaluation. Preliminary studies using standardised image analysis platforms, such as ImageJ, indicate that exudative effusions more frequently exhibit higher pixel density than transudates, in association with markers of cellularity, protein content, and inflammation. Hybrid scoring systems combining quantitative metrics with morphological sonographic features, such as septations, fibrin strands, and debris, have been explored and may enhance diagnostic specificity, although validation remains limited. However, methodological constraints, operator- and device-dependent variability and small sample sizes continue to restrict their applicability in routine clinical practice. Emerging approaches, including artificial intelligence, may be able to mitigate these limitations by standardising measurements, harmonising grayscale output, and integrating clinical, laboratory and imaging data to generate real-time risk scores. In the absence of robustly validated evidence, quantitative TUS should be regarded as an investigational adjunct, with potential to refine PF characterisation, support clinical decision-making, and inform future research on noninvasive diagnostic strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.