ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Effects of three strength training methods on lower extremity strength, jump and sprint performance: a network meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weightlifting (WT) and Plyometric training (PT) may lead to comparable enhancements in strength, jump, and sprint performance. However, these two training modalities appear to differ significantly in their primary focus and underlying mechanisms. Objective: Examining the differences between WT and PT in improving lower extremity sports performance. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from five databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Elsevier, and Springer. Two authors developed specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen relevant literature based on the study objectives. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. We conducted both direct comparisons and network meta-analysis on the eligible studies. The assumptions of similarity, homogeneity, and consistency within the Bayesian network were also confirmed. Results: A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 394 participants. All studies were found to have a low or moderate risk of bias, with average score of 4.29. The Bayesian network meta-analysis showed no significant differences. According to the SUCRA rankings, TT was most likely to excel in squat jumps (SJ) (SUCRA = 0.76) and maximum strength (SUCRA = 0.95), WT for sprint (SUCRA = 0.77), and PT for countermovement jumps (SUCRA = 0.76). The tests of similarity, homogeneity and consistency of the network meta-analysis were also generally valid. The funnel plot and Egger regression tests indicated no publication bias. Conclusion: In summary, the WT programs are more effective at improving sprint performance by increasing power, while the PT programs improve jumping performance by improving the stretch-shortening cycle. Systematic Review Registration: identifier CRD 420250540130.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.