ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2025
Assessing the Accuracy of the International Evidence-Based Kyoto Guidelines for Detecting Malignancy in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.
Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discontinuing Surveillance of Low-Risk Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Routine Practice: An External Application of the "Trivial" Criteria and the Resources it Would Release in Fourteen Health Systems.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) of the Pancreas: History, Myths, and Realities Between Past and Future.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic tumours with an associated risk of malignant transformation. Due to the widespread use of imaging techniques, the diagnosis of IPMNs has been rising. The International Evidence-Based Kyoto Guidelines (IKG), the latest update of the International Guidelines, were developed to refine the management of IPMNs. IKG incorporate high-risk stigmata and worrisome features (WF) into the decision-making process. This study evaluates the accuracy of these guidelines in identifying patients requiring surgery. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study conducted at a University Hospital, including adult patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for IPMNs between 2010 and 2024. Data on demographic characteristics, imaging findings, surgical procedures, and histopathological outcomes were collected. Criteria for surgery, according to the IKG, were retrospectively applied. The diagnostic performance of IKG was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy. Results: One hundred and six patients (mean age: 67 ± 10 years) were included, and 18.9% had histologically confirmed malignant IPMNs. The sensitivity of IKG in detecting malignancy was 100%, while the specificity was 19.8%. The positive negative predictive values were 22.5% and 100%, respectively. The most predictive factors for malignancy were the presence of lymphadenopathy, abrupt changes in main pancreatic duct calibre, and elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9. An association was observed between the number of WF and the malignancy rate. Discussion: The IKG demonstrated excellent sensitivity in selecting patients for surgery, ensuring that all malignant cases were identified. However, the low specificity suggests the need for criteria revision to minimize overtreatment. Future guidelines should focus on integrating patient-specific factors, such as age and comorbidities, into decision-making algorithms to optimize management strategies and to consider the weight and number of WF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.