ArticleJournal of statistical theory and practice2026
Enhancing Team Science by Training Collaborative Biostatisticians to have a Strong Statistical Voice.
Article in Journal of statistical theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strong statistical voice is defined as the ability to advocate and negotiate for good and ethical statistical practices, including integrating and resolving differing scientific approaches. This skill is crucial for biostatisticians who work on biomedical research teams, as it ensures the integrity and accuracy of statistical analyses and fosters productive collaborations with non-statisticians. Despite its importance, new graduates often lack targeted training opportunities. This manuscript presents a scalable training approach through the development of online videos. Preliminary didactic materials focused on two key applications: providing written comments on manuscripts and engaging in study design discussions. To evaluate this training approach, a survey was conducted among biostatistics staff in the Duke Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Core. The survey results indicated that all respondents strongly agreed on the importance of strong statistical voice in biostatistics practice. The clarity of the training materials and examples received positive feedback, though suggestions for improvement included enhancing video engagement and providing more hands-on training. This information will guide the development of formal training videos embedded within a mentored training program that aims to teach biostatisticians and other quantitative scientists how to effectively work on teams in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.