ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2025
Optimizing Research Visibility: The Role of Investigators and Shared (Core) Research Resources in Publications Using RRIDs.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A National Assessment of Cancer Center Shared Resources Metrics: Results from the First NACCSR Survey.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared Research Resources (SRRs), also known as core facilities or research cores, play a pivotal role in advancing scientific discovery by providing specialized equipment, services, and expert guidance. SRRs provide integral contributions to research and have an active role in upholding, rigor, reproducibility, and adherence to FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse), but are frequently underacknowledged in scientific publications. This paper underscores the importance of formally recognizing SRRs in research outputs, both to enhance transparency and to support institutional efforts in securing funding, recruiting faculty, and sustaining infrastructure. Drawing on guidelines from the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities, we explore the challenges to widespread SRR acknowledgment and propose actionable strategies for researchers and SRR staff to ensure proper credit is given. Acknowledgment not only validates the intellectual and technical contributions of SRRs, ranging from experimental design to data interpretation, but also serves as a critical metric for career advancement within the SRR sector. By fostering a culture of recognition, the research community can better uphold standards of excellence and collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.