Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409381›Full record

ReviewInnovation in aging2025

Green space and older adults' health: a scoping review.

Qi Wang, Jingxing Song, Zhaoqi Liu, Cheng Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qi WangCentre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jingxing SongSchool of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9628-4487
Zhaoqi LiuLandscape Architecture Department, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Guandong, China.
Cheng ShiSchool of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-3135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Previous research has highlighted the connections between individuals' exposure to green spaces and various health outcomes. However, the unique post-retirement context of older adults, characterized by changes in activity patterns and mobility, has not been thoroughly examined on a global scale. This scoping review aims to map the evidence on how different representations and metrics of green spaces relate to diverse health outcomes among older adults and to identify the key factors that differentiate these relationships. Research Design and Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley 5-stage framework, a systematic search was conducted in 4 major databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO. Articles were included if they focused on green space exposures and older adults' health outcomes. Results: A total of 40 studies, primarily cross-sectional and conducted in different countries, were included. These studies spanned a wide range of green space metrics and health outcomes. Overall, they consistently found that exposure to green spaces correlates with improved perceived physical and mental health among older adults, while these relationships vary due to the influence of confounders, moderators, and medicators. Discussion and Implications: The findings suggest a positive association between green space exposure and health among older adults, though the cross-sectional nature of most included studies limits the ability to establish causality. This review also outlines potential pathways linking green spaces to health benefits, providing a comprehensive framework for future investigations. These insights can guide further research, particularly longitudinal or intervention-based studies, to deepen our understanding of how green spaces can promote healthy aging.

Indexed as

Blue spaceGreenspaceMental wellbeingUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID41409381
PMCPMC12707908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.