Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409304›Full record

ReviewMolecular syndromology2026

Genetic Syndromes Including Intellectual Disability and Different Cancer Types.

Gül Ünsel-Bolat, Esra Dutar, Hilmi Bolat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular syndromology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gül Ünsel-BolatDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
Esra DutarDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
Hilmi BolatDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine genetic syndromes including both cancers and intellectual disabilities, specific cancer types accompanying intellectual disabilities. Summary: We obtained the data from the clinical synopsis of the syndromes available in the OMIM database (https://www.omim.org/). In the first step, we detected 794 syndromes using different terms of intellectual disabilities and cancers. In the second step, we investigated the clinical synopsis of each syndrome in detail. Of these, we included 99 syndromes in which both intellectual disability and any type of cancer were presented. In the third step, we collected following data of these 99 syndromes: OMIM number, gene and location, syndrome/protein, tumor/neoplasia, inheritance, growth, head/neck, respiratory, cardiovascular, abdomen, genitourinary, skeletal, skin/nails/hair, neurologic, endocrine features, immunology, prenatal manifestations, laboratory abnormalities, and other system findings. Key Messages: The most common cancer types among these 99 syndromes are listed in percentage. Since individuals with intellectual disabilities have difficulty expressing themselves and understanding the symptoms of the disease, the diagnosis of diseases in these people is late and their treatment becomes difficult. We suggest that genetic tests to be performed in intellectual disability are important for early diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of accompanying cancers. We especially emphasize the importance of leukemia, brain tumors, and tumors of embryonal origin in individuals with intellectual disability.

Indexed as

CancerGenetic screeningIntellectual disability

Identifiers

PMID41409304
PMCPMC12707943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.