SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
The efficacy and safety of ATR inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ataxia-Telangiectasia, DNA Repair Deficits, Immune Dysfunction, and Cancer: A Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Presentations, and Emerging Therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Emerging roles of ATR beyond DNA damage repair: orchestrating transcriptional reprogramming during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase (ATR) is a central regulator of the DNA damage response and a promising therapeutic target in tumors with genomic instability. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ATR inhibitors in patients with solid tumors. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and major Chinese and international databases up to September 2025 identified ten clinical trials including 810 patients treated with ATR inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination. Outcomes assessed included objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse events. Pooled analyses showed no significant overall improvement in efficacy endpoints compared with standard therapies. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated marked benefit in non-small cell lung cancer, with significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival, while efficacy in other tumor types was minimal. The overall risk of adverse events was comparable to control groups, although hematologic toxicities such as myelosuppression (pooled RR = 1.04) and neutropenia (pooled RR = 1.34) were common. These findings suggest that ATR inhibitors may be particularly effective in non-small cell lung cancer and selected ovarian cancer subgroups, but further biomarker-driven randomized trials are required to confirm their clinical value and optimize patient selection. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251123612.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.