Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409233›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Optimal diving: patch quality, depth, and marginal value.

Alasdair I Houston, Annette Fayet, John M McNamara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alasdair I HoustonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-7692
Annette FayetNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Høgskoleringen 9, Trondheim 7034, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-0500
John M McNamaraSchool of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Marginal Value Theorem, a widely used model of how long an animal should spend foraging on a given patch, has often been invoked in the context of diving animals to predict optimal underwater foraging time. Here, we highlight and address two main issues regarding using the Marginal Value Theorem in this context. First, we show that the theorem's central assumption of diminishing returns from foraging may not always be correct or necessary, and provide an analysis demonstrating that both ecological and physiological influences on patch residency time-based on prey abundance and aerobic capacity, respectively-which have sometimes been presented as alternatives are, in fact, both important and interacting. Second, we attempt to clarify common confusions around interpreting how environmental quality should affect optimal foraging time, in the cases of homogeneous and heterogenous habitats, for which the effect of quality differ. Finally, we discuss a case in which the foraging gain depends on both foraging time and depth, and prove that the optimal foraging depth is not necessarily the depth at which the energetic rate of gain peaks. Altogether, the clarifications and general proofs we provide should improve future interpretations of models of optimal foraging in diving animals.

Indexed as

dive depthMarginal Value Theoremoxygen depletionpatch quality

Identifiers

PMID41409233
PMCPMC12705306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.