ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Real-world Evaluation of Histoplasmosis Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients From a Michigan Health System.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite classification as the most common endemic mycosis in the United States, few data exist supporting the optimal care of patients with histoplasmosis, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. This study aimed to describe patients with histoplasmosis across a Michigan health system. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients diagnosed with histoplasmosis between January 2020 and April 2023. The primary objective was to describe patients diagnosed with histoplasmosis, methods of diagnosis, and treatment they received. Patient outcomes, including mortality with treatment, and 6-month relapse of disease, were also evaluated. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the study, and most received care from an infectious diseases provider (86.4%). Tissue histopathology was the most common diagnostic method (59%). Treatment was initiated in 58 patients (66%); 17 (29.3) had disseminated disease. Five (8.6%) patients died within 6 months. Itraconazole was the agent most prescribed for definitive therapy (81%) followed by posaconazole (17%). Median treatment duration was 24 weeks. Adverse events occurred in more than one quarter of patients receiving triazoles. Loading doses were absent in 35% of itraconazole prescriptions; therapeutic drug monitoring was absent in 19.2%. No patients experienced a relapse of disease within 6 months of therapy completion. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with histoplasmosis from Michigan, variation in diagnostic testing and treatment was observed. Most patients were diagnosed by positive tissue histopathology and itraconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal followed by posaconazole. Opportunities for more sensitive diagnostic testing and improved antifungal dose optimization and monitoring were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.