ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Combined citicoline and Cerebrolysin for neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phytochemical and Fungal Bioactive Compounds in the "Brain Health Triad": A Narrative Review on Neurostimulating, Neurotrophic, and Neuroprotective Synergy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) remains a major cause of long-term disability and mortality worldwide. Beyond the initial mechanical damage, a cascade of secondary injuries involving neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and excitotoxicity exacerbates neural dysfunction. Neuroprotective agents such as citicoline and Cerebrolysin have shown promise in addressing these complex mechanisms and supporting recovery. This study aimed to evaluate whether a combination therapy of citicoline and Cerebrolysin improves neurological outcomes compared to citicoline monotherapy in patients suffering from sTBI. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted at a single university hospital. Patients with sTBI treated between 2012 and 2021 were included. Two cohorts were matched based on a validated prognostic scoring system to ensure comparability. One group received citicoline monotherapy, while the other received a combination of citicoline and Cerebrolysin. The primary endpoint was neurological function 6 months after injury. Secondary outcomes included survival and duration of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Results: Eighty patients were analyzed. While there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in neurological function or mortality at 6 months, patients receiving the combination therapy showed a tendency toward better neurological outcomes. Notably, this group also exhibited more severe baseline injury profiles, which may have influenced the results. Conclusion: Combined treatment with citicoline and Cerebrolysin may offer additional benefits for neurological recovery in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Although statistical significance was not reached, the observed trend supports the need for further prospective, controlled studies to explore potential therapeutic advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.