ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Developing and validating entrustable professional activities for neurology residency training programs in Saudi Arabia: a modified Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Education Research: More Than a Checkbox: Implementing a Narrative-Based Child Neurology Resident Assessment System.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are tasks that medical professionals can be entrusted to perform in unsupervised settings once they have achieved sufficient specific competencies. Despite their importance, nationally validated neurology EPAs are lacking in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to develop and validate neurology EPAs in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A list of neurology EPAs was developed after an extensive review of existing neurology training program competencies and EPAs. Neurology experts were invited to participate in two rounds of a modified Delphi technique to review the list of EPAs and assess their relevance and representativeness using a 5-point Likert scale. In total, 21 neurologists participated in the study. Descriptive statistics were used to describe participants' demographic characteristics and group responses to each EPA. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the responses across both Delphi rounds. Results: In the first round, 26 EPAs were validated, 10 were excluded owing to a lack of relevance, and one EPA was added as a modification of the existing items. In the second round, one more EPA was excluded because of a lack of relevance, resulting in a final set of 25 neurology EPAs. Conclusion: This study developed and content-validated a set of EPAs for neurology residency training in Saudi Arabia. It represents an initial step toward implementing an EPA-based curriculum. Further steps are necessary to ensure adequate integration into training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.