Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409212›Full record

ReviewCambridge prisms. Precision medicine2025

Artificial intelligence in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic literature review.

Arslaan Javaeed, Anna Schuh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arslaan JavaeedOncology, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-4221
Anna SchuhOncology, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-8490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women globally and the most prevalent cancer in women. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based frameworks have shown great promise in correctly classifying breast carcinomas, particularly those that may have been difficult to discern through routine microscopy. Additionally, mitotic number quantification utilizing AI technology is more accurate than manual counting. With its many advantages, such as improved accuracy, efficiency and consistency as shown in this literature review, AI has promise for significantly enhancing breast cancer diagnosis in the clinical world despite the paramount obstacles that must be addressed. Ongoing research and innovation are essential for overcoming these challenges and effectively harnessing AI's transformative potential in breast cancer detection and assessment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancercancer diagnosishistopathologyneural networks

Identifiers

PMID41409212
PMCPMC12708007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.