ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Primary Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Dorsolateral Anorectum Resected via a Posterior Approach: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can arise anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. When they originate outside the gastrointestinal tract, they are referred to as extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs), which are rare. In particular, EGISTs arising in the perianorectal region are extremely rare. We report the case of a primary perianorectal EGIST, which was initially diagnosed preoperatively as a rectal GIST. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman presented with a palpable mass on her left buttock. Histopathological analysis of the biopsy specimen confirmed the diagnosis of GIST. MRI revealed a 46 × 28 mm mass on the left dorsolateral aspect of the lower rectum, which was preoperatively diagnosed as rectal GIST. Partial resection of the rectum via a posterior approach was planned. Intraoperatively, however, no continuity between the tumor and rectal wall was observed. Based on pathological and operative findings, the tumor was diagnosed as a perianorectal EGIST, and complete resection was achieved without rectal resection.
conclusionsThis case underscores the clinical significance of considering EGIST as a differential diagnosis for anorectal GIST lacking clear continuity with the intestinal wall. Furthermore, our experience suggests that posterior approach is less invasive, facilitates anus preservation, and should be considered for resection of both rectal GISTs and perianorectal EGISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.