ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2025
External validation of a genomic signature for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We previously presented a genomic signature predictive of both oligometastatic disease state and oligoprogression in patients with brain metastases. We sought to validate this oligometastatic genomic signature using an independent dataset of patients without brain metastases. Methods: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and liquid biopsy-based genomic profiling (Guardant Health) were identified in our departmental database. Those with brain metastases were excluded. Patients were assigned an oligometastatic risk score based on the previously derived genomic signature. Oligometastatic disease was defined as ≤5 metastases without diffuse single-organ involvement. For oligometastatic patients, we performed a competing risk analysis for the cumulative incidence of oligoprogression. Cox regression was used to determine association between oligometastatic risk score and oligoprogression. Results: A total of 225 patients met inclusion criteria for this validation dataset. 158 patients (70%) had oligometastatic disease. Patients with positive and neutral/negative risk scores had a 70 vs 48% likelihood of oligometastatic disease, respectively ( Conclusion: In this independent dataset, our genomic signature predicted oligometastatic disease state and showed a trend towards prediction of oligoprogression. With further study, our findings may suggest a biomarker with future potential to direct local therapies in oligometastatic NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41409187PMC12708001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.