ArticleJournal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP2025
Consensus recommendations for the integration of critical care pharmacists on intensive care unit teams: Endorsed by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, and Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Article in Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposed Context-of-Use Evaluation Framework for Medication Management Tasks Completed by Generative Artificial Intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing critical care pharmacotherapy: dynamic prospective evaluation of the medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score in critically ill patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rx-LLM: a benchmarking suite to evaluate safe large language model performance for medication-related tasks.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The care of critically ill patients requires an interprofessional team. Critical care pharmacists are essential members of that interprofessional team. The purpose of these Consensus Recommendations is to present standards and guidance for individual pharmacists, institutions, and standard-setting bodies regarding best practices for the team integration of critical care pharmacists. Twenty one individuals were invited to serve on an interprofessional expert panel. A modified Delphi approach was used to structure the consensus process for generating the consensus recommendation statements. A total of 10 consensus recommendation statements were developed along with implementation guidance, process and outcome metrics, and a future agenda for research and advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.