Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409125›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2025

A comparative evaluation of eggshell derived hydroxyapatite and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in alveolar ridge preservation - a randomized clinical trial.

Mopati Nishanth Reddy Gokul, Konathala Sv Ramesh, Penmetsa S Gautami, Naga Venkata Sg Sruthima, Pasupuleti Mohan Kumar, Kanakamedala Anilkumar, Chittabathina Poornima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mopati Nishanth Reddy GokulDepartment of Periodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Konathala Sv RameshDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Penmetsa S GautamiDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Naga Venkata Sg SruthimaDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Pasupuleti Mohan KumarDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kanakamedala AnilkumarDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Chittabathina PoornimaDepartment of Periodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is critical for minimizing post-extraction bone loss and maintaining ridge dimensions essential for prosthetic replacement. Eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite (EHA), owing to its compositional similarity to natural bone and promising biological properties, has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional graft materials such as Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA). The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of EHA and DFDBA in ARP. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial involved 20 patients requiring mandibular posterior extractions, which were assigned to two groups: EHA (test) and DFDBA (control). In both groups, bone grafts were combined with injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) to form sticky bone and sealed with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) membranes. Clinical parameters such as Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Width of Keratinized Gingiva (WKG) and radiographic parameters such as Vertical Ridge Height, Horizontal Ridge Width, and Bone Density were evaluated at baseline and Healing Index (HI) was evaluated after 2 weeks. Results: Both study groups exhibited significant improvements in PI, GI, WKG, vertical ridge height and horizontal ridge width within group with no significant difference between the groups. However, EHA demonstrated less ridge reduction compared to DFDBA with no significant changes in bone density. Wound healing at 2 weeks showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: EHA with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an effective, affordable, and biocompatible option for ARP. EHA demonstrated greater ridge dimensional stability and similar bone density improvements compared to DFDBA, with minimal resorption and favorable healing outcomes.

Indexed as

Alveolar ridge preservationDFDBAegg shell hydroxyapatitekeratinized gingiva

Identifiers

PMID41409125
PMCPMC12706998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.