Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409123›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2025

Dileepkumar Hemamalini, S Shantha Sundari, K M Shahul Hameed Faizee, Sivakamavalli Jeyachandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dileepkumar HemamaliniDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
S Shantha SundariDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
K M Shahul Hameed FaizeeDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sathayabama Dental College and Hospital, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India.
Sivakamavalli JeyachandranLab in Biotechnology and Biosignal Transduction, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and objectives: To evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties of Materials and methods: Methanolic extracts of Results: The extract showed dose-dependent antibacterial activity, with maximum inhibition observed at 100 µg/mL. Biofilm inhibition also increased with concentration. Antioxidant assays revealed significant radical scavenging activity, with results comparable to controls at higher concentrations. Anti-inflammatory testing showed reduced protein denaturation in treated samples, with effects similar to the positive control and significantly better than the blank. Conclusion:

Indexed as

Amphiroa FragilisimaBioactive polysaccharidewhite spot lesion

Identifiers

PMID41409123
PMCPMC12706997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.