ArticlePleura and peritoneum2025
Co-occurrence of peritoneal mesothelioma and genitourinary cancers: a case series with comparative outcomes.
Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) shares features with genitourinary (GU) malignancies, including histologic appearance, embryologic origin and genetic predispositions. However, data on their co-occurrence are limited. The study presents a case series of PM patients with associated GU malignancies and explores outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Methods: A prospectively maintained CRS-HIPEC database from a tertiary referral center (2011-2024) was reviewed. Demographics, tumor characteristics and outcomes were compared between PM patients with and without GU malignancies (including gynecologic and urologic cancers). Results: Among 237 CRS-HIPEC patients, 8/17 patients with PM were found to have another GU malignancy (median age 52.8, 62.5 % male). This included renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, ovarian tumors and cervical carcinoma. Most GU malignancies were diagnosed before PM (5/8), two were diagnosed post-CRS-HIPEC, and one synchronously. Three patients reported asbestos exposure; two had Conclusions: GU malignancy is common among PM patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC and could represent a higher-risk subgroup. These findings raise the hypothesis of a potential association between PM and GU malignancy. Shared origins, oncogenesis of similar cell types, environmental exposures or genetic predispositions may contribute and warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.