ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Rotational Grazing Supports Coexistence of the Endangered Pygmy Bluetongue and Livestock on a Productive Agricultural Property.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural grasslands have the potential to complement conservation initiatives whilst maintaining productivity. A shift from set-stock continuous grazing to rotational grazing has the capacity to improve ecosystem function to support both biodiversity and livestock production. Using a 'before' and 'after' comparative design, we assessed the responses of endangered pygmy bluetongue lizards and vegetation structure to set-stock, rotational and grazing exclusion on a landscape-scale. To implement our design, we erected new fence lines to divide an existing set-stock paddock to become rotationally grazed while the landowner managed stock levels conducive to productivity. We found vegetation cover increased in grazing exclusion and experimental grazing areas and lizards responded positively to this increase. The implementation of rotational grazing was beneficial for lizards. The increase in vegetation cover will likely also be conducive for livestock productivity. Our study demonstrates there are potential mutual benefits, economically and ecologically, for landowners and conservationists to implement rotational grazing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.