Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409069›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

An exploratory assessment model for preventing individual extreme violent crimes from a social control perspective-a qualitative study of four Chinese cases.

Gu Anqi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gu AnqiDepartment of Investigation, Jiangsu Police Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Individual extreme violent crimes pose a severe threat to public safety. From a social control perspective, this paper explores the dimensions of "formal control," "informal control," and "self-control". Drawing on criminological paradigms, it proposes an exploratory prevention and control evaluation model for such crimes. Methods: The model's utility is preliminarily tested through an in-depth analysis of four illustrative cases in China, exploring failures in institutional management, support ties, and self-regulation. Results: The analysis suggests that the suspects in these cases exhibited low self-regulation abilities and weak psychological adjustment when facing life challenges. These extreme crimes appeared prone to occur when informal social ties were weakened or broken, even while some forms of formal control were present. Discussion: By applying a social control framework, this study offers a new analytical tool that complements traditional, macro-level crime prevention research. Rather than providing definitive solutions, the model is intended to serve as a heuristic device for identifying systemic weaknesses, thereby promoting a more nuanced understanding of extreme violence both theoretically and empirically.

Indexed as

formal controlindividual extreme violent crimeinformal controlprevention and control evaluation modelself-control

Identifiers

PMID41409069
PMCPMC12705580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.