Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408991›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Perisaccadic Attentional Updating in Area V4: A Neurocomputational Approach.

Julia Bergelt, Fred H Hamker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia BergeltDepartment of Computer Science, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Fred H HamkerDepartment of Computer Science, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9104-7143

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HA 2630/15-1Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01GQ1409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychophysical studies with human subjects investigated the dynamics of spatial visual attention around the time of saccades. They revealed that attention pointers remap against saccade direction, but at the same time show a lingering at the irrelevant retinotopic position after saccade. Involved brain areas have remained elusive. However, recordings from neurons in visual area V4 of macaques confirm remapping of spatial attention to a position opposite to the saccade direction shortly before saccade onset. Unexpectedly, in comparison with behavioral data from human subjects, a neural correlate of the lingering of spatial attention has not been observed in V4. To better understand the underlying computational mechanisms of attentional updating in V4, we developed a neurocomputational model of perisaccadic visual attention in area V4 by incorporating perisaccadic spatio-temporal signals from the frontal eye field (FEF) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). When we test this model on the same task, our obtained data replicate the observation of predictive remapping of spatial attention pointers in V4. Further, our model provides an intuitive explanation for the lack of lingering attention in the neural recordings: As the monkeys are only rewarded when they detect the target probe at the instructed location, they may aim at minimizing the post-saccadic spread of attention and thus weaken the attention pointer upon saccade planning. By deactivating different pathways, our model predicts that the attentional enhancement measured in V4 originates from spatial updating of a tonic attention pointer and not from a phasic saccade target attention pointer.

Indexed as

AttentionModels, NeurologicalSaccadesVisual CortexAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsSpace PerceptionVisual Perceptionattentioneye movementLIPspatial perceptionV4

Identifiers

PMID41408991
PMCPMC12712554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.