Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408878›Full record

SynthesisThe New phytologist2026

Ecological predictors of plant responses to sequential herbivory: a meta-analysis.

Zoë Delamore, Julia Koricheva, Erik H Poelman

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zoë DelamoreLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-6090
Julia KorichevaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-0171
Erik H PoelmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-613X

Funding

Exacte en Natuurwetenschappen VI.C.212.047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants evolved alongside herbivores for over 400 million years and show remarkable plasticity in responses to attack by multiple herbivores. However, it is often debated which herbivore traits predict plant responses and it is poorly understood how plant life-history traits contribute to the variation observed in plant responses. We explored the role of ecological factors such as herbivore identity and plant life history by conducting a meta-analysis of 161 studies on the effects of sequential herbivory by arthropods, nematodes and mammals. We included herbivore performance and preference as measures of induced resistance and plant growth and damage as measures of plant performance. We uncovered that sequential herbivory reduced herbivore performance in most cases but did not consistently affect herbivore preference. Moreover, induced resistance was particularly observed in glasshouse experiments and in experiments on cultivated plant species. Plants managed to reduce plant damage but did not reduce biomass loss effectively. This study highlights that plants can effectively use induced responses to defend against sequential herbivore attack regardless of herbivore identity or plant life history. To elucidate the cost of multiherbivore attack and plant adaptations to these scenarios, there is a need to examine the consequences of the interactions on plant fitness.

Indexed as

HerbivoryPlantsAnimalsinduced plant resistancemeta‐analysismulti‐herbivoryplant defenceplant–herbivore interactionsplant life historysequential herbivory

Identifiers

PMID41408878
PMCPMC13000986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.