Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408787›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric genetics2026

What do European clinical guidelines say about genetic testing for people with neuropsychiatric disorders? A scoping review.

Izemnur Arican, Marte van der Horst, Nicholas Bass, Janneke R Zinkstok

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Izemnur AricanMental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London.
Marte van der HorstDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
Nicholas BassMental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London.
Janneke R ZinkstokDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic medicine has progressed rapidly, and many high-risk genetic variants for neuropsychiatric disorders have now been identified. However, clinical genetic testing is rarely utilized in psychiatric settings. This scoping review examined European clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for genetic testing in neuropsychiatric disorders to map recommendations and identify gaps. Seventeen CPGs published since 2010 met the inclusion criteria. There was a wide variation in scope, quality, and conditions covered. Seven CPGs addressed autism spectrum disorder, generally recommending testing when additional features such as intellectual disability or dysmorphology were present. One CPG covered the investigation of intellectual disability, advising Fragile X testing, chromosomal microarray, and whole-genome sequencing. Most CPGs (11/17), related to dementia, advising testing with very early onset and/or an indicative family history. Overall, European CPGs for genetic testing in psychiatry vary significantly, contributing to clinician uncertainty. Harmonizing evidence-based CPGs is crucial to advance the integration of genetic testing in psychiatric practice.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMental DisordersPractice Guidelines as TopicEuropeHumansgeneticguidelineneuropsychiatric disordersreviewscopingtesting

Identifiers

PMID41408787
PMCPMC12834271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.