ArticlePsychiatric genetics2026
What do European clinical guidelines say about genetic testing for people with neuropsychiatric disorders? A scoping review.
Article in Psychiatric genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic medicine has progressed rapidly, and many high-risk genetic variants for neuropsychiatric disorders have now been identified. However, clinical genetic testing is rarely utilized in psychiatric settings. This scoping review examined European clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for genetic testing in neuropsychiatric disorders to map recommendations and identify gaps. Seventeen CPGs published since 2010 met the inclusion criteria. There was a wide variation in scope, quality, and conditions covered. Seven CPGs addressed autism spectrum disorder, generally recommending testing when additional features such as intellectual disability or dysmorphology were present. One CPG covered the investigation of intellectual disability, advising Fragile X testing, chromosomal microarray, and whole-genome sequencing. Most CPGs (11/17), related to dementia, advising testing with very early onset and/or an indicative family history. Overall, European CPGs for genetic testing in psychiatry vary significantly, contributing to clinician uncertainty. Harmonizing evidence-based CPGs is crucial to advance the integration of genetic testing in psychiatric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.