ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Optimizing Nivolumab Efficacy: The Role of Dosing Time in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time-of-Day Immunotherapy Administration and Outcomes in Advanced Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Unlocking the clock: a systematic review and meta-analysis on optimizing immune checkpoint inhibitor timing for advanced solid tumors.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although immunotherapy has revolutionized lung cancer treatment, its effectiveness as a single agent in the second-line setting is limited by low response rates and the small number of patients who benefit from it, despite its demonstrating superior overall survival compared to standard chemotherapies. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of nivolumab administration, specifically before or after 1 PM, influences treatment efficacy, thereby exploring its potential role in overcoming drug resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 54 patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer who received nivolumab as second-line therapy between January 2021 and January 2025. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether they received all treatment protocols before or after 1 PM, and treatment outcomes were subsequently compared. RESULTS Patients treated before 1 PM showed statistically significant improvements in treatment response compared to those treated after 1 PM. However, no significant differences were found in progression-free survival or immune-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that the timing of nivolumab administration can affect treatment outcomes, with earlier administration potentially leading to better responses. This observation aligns with the growing body of evidence suggesting that circadian rhythms play a significant role in cancer biology and treatment efficacy. Understanding the mechanisms behind these effects could lead to more effective treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and validate these findings in larger, prospective studies. Despite the lack of clear guidelines, our findings, along with other studies, suggest earlier immunotherapy administration may be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.