ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Plastic Corneal Foreign Body Removal From a 2-Month-Old Infant: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infantile corneal foreign bodies (CFBs) are rare and frequently result in delayed diagnoses and treatment challenges. This report describes a case of a very young infant with a small plastic CFB that was successfully removed. CASE REPORT A 2-month-old boy was observed to have a "small dot" foreign body on his left cornea by his parents. No crying response to the CFB or other symptoms had ever been identified. Slit lamp examination revealed the presence of a small, oval, plastic foreign body in the corneal epithelial layer. This CFB was determined to be an ornament affixed to the dress that the babysitter was wearing at the time. For CFB removal, medical sedation was rejected by the infant's guardian. The initial attempt to flush the CFB out with saline or extract the CFB using a cotton-tipped applicator alone proved unsuccessful. Subsequent release of the CFB from the cornea was facilitated by the addition of proparacaine hydrochloride drops to the conjunctival sac and the use of a 1-mL needle, which was then adhered to the cotton-tipped applicator, thereby enabling its removal. CONCLUSIONS CFBs in young infants may not manifest any symptoms and thus can be easily ignored. The removal of plastic CFBs in those young infants who exhibit limited communication and cooperation abilities remains a challenging procedure. This report proposes a viable and low-risk, office-based approach to address the issue of CFB removal in infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.