ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Informed consent practices among emergency staff for patients undergoing emergency surgery in the emergency surgical units of two tertiary teaching hospitals in Uganda: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStaff in low resourced emergency units of a low-income country face the challenge of obtaining informed consent for incapacitated patients or their next of kin in a time-constrained situation often in an overcrowded environment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the informed consent practices for emergency surgical care among healthcare professional at two emergency surgical units at two tertiary teaching hospitals in Uganda.
methodsIn October 2022 - February 2023we conducted key informant interviews in Uganda and purposively selected 16 staff in surgical emergency units at two tertiary teaching hospitals and directly observed the informed consent practices. Data was managed and analyzed inductively using NVivo version 12.
resultsSix themes emerged from key informant interviews including knowledge and perspectives on informed consent; processes, procedures, and practices regarding informed consent; communication strategies for informed consent; ethical considerations; benefits of informed consent during surgery; and challenges to emergency informed consent. Staff had adequate knowledge about informed consent but faced several challenges during the consent process due to lack of guiding institutional policies. Overall, the informed consent process was inadequate at both institutions with greeting of patients, disclosure of risks and assessment of understanding poorly done. Consent was conducted in a noisy environment at both institutions and there was no privacy in the public hospital.
conclusionAlthough knowledge about consent practices by emergency staff at both institutions was good, in practice there was inadequate disclosure of risks, inadequate knowledge about the surgical procedure, risks, and benefits. Emergency staff identified the need for procedure specific consent documents which capture the information that is given to the patient and guiding policies on consent for incapacitated patients who have no surrogates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.