Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408607›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Principles of practice for a whole school approach to self-harm: a qualitative study.

Anne-Marie Burn, Hayley Gains, Poppy Hall, Joanna K Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne-Marie BurnDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. amb278@cam.ac.uk.
Hayley GainsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Poppy HallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Joanna K AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is common among adolescents and recognised as a significant public health issue. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of young people and school staff about how schools should respond to self-harm and subsequently develop principles of practice.

methodsSeven focus groups were carried out with school staff and young people. Qualitative data were thematically analysed using the Framework Method to generate themes [1, 2]. The findings were translated into actionable items by applying the Implementation in Schools Framework [3].

resultsStaff and students had overlapping views about how schools should address self-harm. These were captured in three themes (1) Understanding the nature and scope of self-harm in schools, (2) Building whole school capacity to respond to self-harm, (3) Creating a supportive school environment. Principles of practice were generated to guide schools in their approach to self-harm.

conclusionFor many young people, schools are a key setting for early intervention in self-harm; however, staff often feel ill-equipped to respond and clear guidance is lacking. This study has developed evidence-informed principles of practice for UK schools, drawing on the perspectives of staff and young people to inform a whole school approach.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesSchoolsSelf-Injurious BehaviorStudentsAdolescentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomNon-suicidal self-injuryNSSIPrinciples of practiceSchoolsSchool staffSelf-harmYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41408607
PMCPMC12822267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.