ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Leprosy elimination: are we winning the fight or losing focus?
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiological profile of leprosy cases at Nazareti Leprosy Center, Tanzania: A retrospective analysis (2000-2024).PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of significant global efforts, leprosy remains persistent a public health challenge, with approximately two million people living with leprosy-related disabilities. This article traces the history of leprosy control, highlights the transformative impact of multidrug therapy (MDT), and warns against the risks of waning global attention. The World Health Organization's (WHO)'s 1991 elimination target-defined as prevalence below 1 case per 10,000 population-drove a campaign that treated over 13 million cases by 2020. However, this statistical success has fostered a false narrative of eradication, leading to reduced funding, political will, and research investment. This article argues that this premature complacency threatens sustainable leprosy control. Persistent stigma, weak health systems, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and disparities in gender and child diagnosis. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these issues, causing a 35.9% drop in case detection in the Americas in 2020. We present evidence from in Brazil, India, and Nigeria where community health agents and local leaders have improved early detection and reduced stigma. The risk of losing focus is greatest for marginalized communities, where the disease continues to thrive unnoticed. We conclude that sustaining progress requires a renewed commitment beyond statistical targets, emphasizing continuous surveillance, community-led initiatives, and a focus on social justice and innovative tools like post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and AI-based diagnostics to ensure that the gains made are not reversed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.