Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408575›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025

Feasibility of AI-simulated patients for tailored selection of diabetes remission prediction models in metabolic bariatric surgery: a proof-of-concept study.

Mohammad Kermansaravi, Matteo Monami, Ricardo V Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad KermansaraviDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Hazrat-E-Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mkermansaravi@yahoo.com.
Matteo MonamiCareggi Teaching Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Ricardo V CohenThe Center for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis proof-of-concept study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of using AI-Simulated Patients (ASPs) to test and illustrate the tailored selection of diabetes remission prediction models.

methodsWe created five initial ASPs representing diverse T2DM cases, each with key clinical parameters, then expanded to 100 ASPs as a convenience sample. Using a standardized process, GPT-4 applied six validated diabetes remission prediction models: DiaRem, A-DiaRem, ABCD, IMS, DiaBetter, and DRI. For each case, GPT-4 assessed input availability, estimated remission scores, discussed model strengths/limitations, and recommended the best-fit tool. Human experts supervised all outputs to ensure accuracy, reliability, and appropriate model selection for each ASP. Exact ranges and distributions were anchored in reported epidemiology of bariatric patient populations (e.g., age 18-70 years, BMI 30-65 kg/m², HbA1c 6-11%, C-peptide 0.2-5 ng/mL) with variability introduced for diversity. Sample size (n = 100) was chosen for breadth of illustration rather than statistical power.

resultsWe applied a refined, criteria-based algorithm to 100 ASPs representing diverse T2DM cases considered for metabolic/bariatric surgery. Model selection incorporated key inputs, planned procedure, and model validation scope. The DRI was most common, followed by DiaBetter, ABCD Score, Advanced DiaRem, and IMS Score. Each recommendation reflected surgical type and data completeness. The resulting decision-making algorithm illustrates a reproducible methodology that may support future tailored application of remission prediction models, pending validation in real clinical datasets.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that LLM-generated simulated patients can refine a reproducible, transparent, and ethically safe algorithm for selecting diabetes remission prediction models, with future validation required using real-world clinical data.

Indexed as

AI-Simulated patientArtificial intelligenceDiabetesMetabolic bariatric surgeryPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID41408575
PMCPMC12709772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.