Observational studyArthritis research & therapy2025
Compositional patterns of device-measured movement behaviour in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the multicentre ActiMON study.
Observational study in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are at increased risk for long-term physical and psychosocial complications, making physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) key modifiable lifestyle factors. Although increasingly acknowledged as relevant, data on the daily distribution of these behaviours in JIA remain scarce. This study aimed to (1) describe the time-use composition of SB and PA intensities in young people with JIA, (2) identify correlates of greater relative time spent in SB, and (3) compare movement behaviour patterns to matched population controls using a compositional data analysis (CoDA) approach.
methodsPatients aged 10–20 years with JIA and individually matched population controls wore hip-worn accelerometers (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT) for eight consecutive days. Movement behaviours were categorized into SB, light-intensity PA, and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) using validated, age-specific cut-points. CoDA with log-ratio transformations was used to model associations and compare groups. Diifferences in movement composition were assessed using adjusted multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
resultsData from 126 matched pairs (mean age: 15.0 ± 2.1 years; 67% female) were analysed. Patients spent, on average, 86% of waking time in SB, 8% in light-intensity PA, and 6% in MVPA. Overall, 76% did not meet the WHO recommendation of an average of ≥ 60 min of MVPA per day. Among those who did, 87% still spent ≥ 75% of their wear time sedentary. A greater proportion of SB relative to PA was associated with female gender (B = 0.13; p = 0.042), higher age (B = 0.06; p < 0.001), and higher BMI (B = 0.01; p = 0.049). Compared to controls, patients spent more time in SB, less in light-intensity PA, and slightly more in vigorous PA (all p < 0.001). Group differences remained significant after adjustment and were consistent across weekdays and weekends.
conclusionsYoung people with well-controlled JIA show a distinctly unbalanced movement behaviour composition compared to controls, marked by a predominance of sedentary behaviour—even among those meeting PA guidelines. This highlights the limitations of threshold-based definitions and underscores the importance of assessing full daily movement patterns. Promoting light-intensity PA may offer a feasible strategy to reduce sedentary time, particularly in girls, older adolescents, and individuals with higher BMI.
trial registrationThe study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022258).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.