ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Predicting mortality in critically ill patients: a machine learning approach to electrolyte imbalances and clinical risk factors.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mean arterial pressure-to-norepinephrine-equivalent dose ratio, rather than achieved mean arterial pressure alone, is associated with mortality in septic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Admission Electrolyte Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Artificial Nutrition in Critical Illness: Integrating Indirect Calorimetry and BIVA for Metabolic Precision.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Diabetes Mellitus Is an Independent Predictor of Short-Term Mortality in Critically Ill ICU Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) exhibit high mortality due to complex interactions among metabolic instability, organ dysfunction, and therapeutic interventions. While conventional severity scores like SOFA and APACHE II are widely used, they insufficiently integrate dynamic metabolic markers.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,004 adult ICU patients. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost). Model performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, calibration slope, and sensitivity at fixed specificity threshold.
resultsThe ICU mortality was 30.7%. Independent predictors of mortality included SOFA score ≥ 8 (aOR = 4.0), mechanical ventilation (aOR = 3.1), hyperlactatemia ≥ 4 mmol/L (aOR = 2.6), vasopressor use (aOR = 2.7), and GCS ≤ 8 (aOR = 2.4). The XGBoost model achieved superior discrimination (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.83–0.89) compared to logistic regression (AUC = 0.84), SOFA (AUC = 0.72), and APACHE II (AUC = 0.75). A validated nomogram incorporating eight key predictors stratified mortality risk into four actionable tiers. Subgroup analysis confirmed robust performance across age strata, sepsis status, and AKI stages.
conclusionsIntegrating metabolic markers with clinical severity scores enhances ICU mortality prediction. Our nomogram offers a practical, interpretable tool for bedside risk stratification and clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.